Employers Must Ensure Compliance with the Families First Coronavirus Response Act as they Re-Open and Recall Employees from Furlough

The U.S. Department of Labor recently issued new Questions and Answers regarding its interpretation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). In relevant part, the DOL made clear that if an employer is calling employees back from furlough, the employer may not use either (a) the fact that an employee requested leave under the FFCRA prior to the furlough; or (b) an assumption that an employee may request leave under the FFCRA if called back, in making the decision as to which employees to recall from furlough. Employers also may not use an assumption that a prospective employee may request leave under the FFCRA in determining whether or not to hire such prospective employee.

To illustrate, assume Employee A requested FFCRA leave when her daughter’s school was closed in March 2020. Employee A was granted the leave request and was on leave until the employer conducted furloughs in May 2020. If the employer is bringing employees back from furlough, the employer cannot use the fact that Employee A was on leave at the time of furlough and/or the employer’s assumption that Employee A may again request FFCRA leave in making the determination as to whether to call back Employee A from furlough.

The DOL’s guidance also confirmed that an employee’s entitlement to leave under the FFCRA does not “restart” when an employee is called back from furlough. For example, if an employee used 10 hours of Emergency Paid Sick Leave prior to the furlough, the employee is entitled to use the remaining 70 hours (for a qualifying reason) after being returned, but is not entitled to use 80 hours as if they were a new employee.

In addition, the time an employee spent furloughed does not count toward the employee’s leave entitlement under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Act. To illustrate, assume a full-time employee is entitled to 480 hours of EFMLA (40×12), used 100 hours of EFMLA leave prior to the furlough, and was then furloughed for 5 weeks (which would correlate to 200 hours). The 200 hours of furloughed time does not count against the employee’s EFMLA entitlement. Accordingly, if/when the employee is recalled, the employee is entitled to use the remaining 380 hours of EFMLA (if qualified) upon his or her return.

About Amanda Marie Baer

Amanda Marie Baer is a Partner in the firm's Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Group.  Amanda focuses her practice on representing employers in federal and state courts and before the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. Amanda defends employers against claims concerning discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, interference, and accommodations.  Amanda also has experience in conducting workplace investigations into allegations of discrimination or harassment, and litigating to enforce (or defend claims regarding) employment, noncompetition/nonsolicitation, and severance agreements. Amanda's litigation experience makes her a valuable resource for employers seeking counsel on a myriad of day-to-day human resources issues and/or employment actions.
This entry was posted in COVID-19. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Employers Must Ensure Compliance with the Families First Coronavirus Response Act as they Re-Open and Recall Employees from Furlough

  1. Robert S. says:

    Great work detailing the FFCRA and how it helps employees during this time. The COVID-19 pandemic has made many people fearful of their futures, including from a professional standpoint, so having this in place ensures security in the long term.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s